Twitter icon Email alerts icon Latest News RSS icon Magazine icon Stay connected:

View the article online at

Coutts’ suitability review set to include investment bonds

by Danielle Levy on Jun 13, 2014 at 09:46

Coutts’ suitability review set to include investment bonds

Coutts’ suitability review, as revealed by Wealth Manager last week, is understood to include financial planning products, such as offshore insurance bonds, alongside its own internal funds such as Orbita and Novus.

The private bank is embarking on a review of the suitability of all investments advised by Coutts staff in the UK, held both on and offshore, including Coutts’ own investments and those managed by third parties. The review goes up to 26 November 2012, the date Coutts implemented the retail distribution review (RDR).

The inclusion of financial planning products, such as insurance bonds, corporate property bonds and maximum investment plans (MIPs), could mean there is potentially more scope for compensation payouts, according to one source who is close to the situation.

‘The emphasis for potential mis-selling is not on the investment management side, it could be on the financial planning side where they have been recommending offshore bonds and MIPs,’ said the source.

Stuart Fowler, founder and director of Fowler Drew, has taken on a number of ex-Coutts clients over the past few years. He said a theme running through their existing arrangements had been a bias towards investment bonds.

He believes this was likely to have been influenced by the large commission payments that were on offer from these products. He was also keen to add that this was not just true of Coutts and has been prevalent among other firms.

‘If the clients we have analysed are in fact representative, there appears to have been a systemic strategy of recommending investment bonds. The peg to hang that strategy on was the various forms of restrictions on pension contributions, either the lifetime or annual allowance,’ he said.

‘However, offshore bonds were likely to leave the clients in a worse tax position.’

He said this is because neither the clients nor their spouses were likely to be basic rate taxpayers or non-resident at retirement.

As the scale of compensation payments cannot yet be determined, Coutts has declined to disclose how much the bank is setting aside to cover this.

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

1 comment so far. Why not have your say?

Anonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'

Jun 13, 2014 at 13:21

So those financial planners who have allegedly had the huge redundancy pay-off on top of the huge bonuses when employed, might be found to have given poor advice. But of course the Coutts managers who allegedly knew little about financial planning but were driving these same advisers to achieve their massive targets - will have no responsibility.

Maybe the alleged overseas golf trips with off-shore bond providers for those managers and their best advisers will have caused their judgement to be clouded. Disgusting.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Sponsored Video: Bringing it all back home

As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.

Today's top headlines

Investing for income in a changing environment

With talk on interest rates on the horizon, our latest roundtable debate covers income investing against a changing backdrop

On the road

Click here to find out more from the Audience Development team.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet