View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/wealth-manager/article/a744191
Exclusive survey: where wealth managers expect fund prices to settle
by Robert St George on Apr 09, 2014 at 11:31
A Wealth Manager survey has revealed the majority of wealth managers expect to access funds as cheaply as the large platforms.
Asked what pricing level they expected to secure if funds’ annual management charges (AMCs) continue to fall, 59.5% answered less than 65 basis points for active equity products. On the active bond side, 71.8% of respondents expected less than 50 basis points.
Skandia has reported an average AMC of 0.58% on the sub-advised funds on its WealthSelect list, which moves down to 0.52% when Old Mutual’s internal products are included. Hargreaves Lansdown has secured an average AMC of 0.54% for the 27 funds on its Wealth 150+ list, while Fidelity’s Select List of approximately 140 funds will have an average AMC of 0.64%.
Looking at such figures, Turcan Connell’s chief investment officer Haig Bathgate observed that they were in line with the prices wealth managers can already command.
‘I don’t think Hargreaves Lansdown probably does get that much cheaper a deal,’ he said. ‘Ultimately they are using their scale to negotiate a better deal, but I don’t think the rates are materially more competitive than we can gain access to for good fund managers.’
Other substantial fund buyers, including Barclays Wealth’s head of multi-manager Jaime Arguello and Société Générale Private Banking Hambros chief investment officer Eric Verleyen, have agreed that the major platforms are not being offered significantly lower rates than them.
Such large firms also concur that it is reasonable for fund groups to hand them and the platforms preferential prices. Stephen Ford, head of investment management at Brewin Dolphin, supposed that it was a natural trade-off.
‘There are pitfalls in having scale,’ he noted. ‘As a scale player in this sector, I enjoy a much higher level of regulatory scrutiny than a smaller firm. But if there aren’t any benefits for scale, why aren’t the normal laws of economics applying? If I am placing more product and providing a higher degree of flow, I would expect to get lower pricing.’
Andrew Summers, head of fund research at Investec Wealth & Investment, came to the same conclusion. ‘If Hargreaves Lansdown has given a manager £100 million and I have given that manager £1 million, what am I supposed to do?’ he wondered.
Yet both equally maintain that performance is more important than price.
News sponsored by:
As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.
Today's top headlines
With talk on interest rates on the horizon, our latest roundtable debate covers income investing against a changing backdrop
More about this:
Look up the shares
More from us
- The performance premium: How much differentiation could we see in fund pricing?
- Can wealth managers cash in on the platform price war?
- M&G boss McLintock: fund price wars are ‘a road to hell’
- Invesco Perpetual overhauls fund charges with single fee
- Wealth managers expect equity fund charges to fall to 50bps
- GAM boss: we can and should resist discounting our prices
- 'Don't give away alpha': Fidelity stands firm on fund pricing
- Skandia unveils WealthSelect discounted AMCs
- Hargreaves Lansdown reveals the 27 super clean funds on 150+
- Fidelity undercuts Hargreaves with 0.35% platform charge
- What does platform price war mean for wealth managers?