Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/wealth-manager/article/a654252
Facing FSCS: how are you budgeting in 2013?
by Danielle Levy on Jan 29, 2013 at 09:48
Budgeting for regulatory spend is perhaps one of the most profound questions facing wealth management executives moving into 2013.
With firms such as Brooks Macdonald and Courtiers estimating they have spent between 10-20% of revenues on regulation in 2012 alone, a raft of senior figures in the industry are warning that we can expect more of the same in 2013.
This is supported by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) estimating that retail distribution review (RDR) compliance will cost firms 75 basis points of revenue per year on an ongoing basis, on top of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) levy, unexpected interim levies, and the ongoing suitability review.
Chris Macdonald, chief executive of Brooks Macdonald, is budgeting for hard regulatory costs over its financial year, which runs from June to June in the region of 5-6% of turnover.
‘However, it should be stressed these are the hard costs and thus likely to be very understated, as management time, for example, would not be accounted for in these figures,’ he added.
FSCS 'notoriously difficult' to budget for
Speaking ahead of the FSA's publication of further proposals to reform FSCS funding, he broke down the costs, citing staff costs relating to compliance, risk and supervisory units as the largest expected outgoing, alongside costs relating to the RDR and ‘repapering’ exercises around suitability. With the FSCS levy totalling £265 million in 2012-2013 alone, Macdonald acknowledges this has proved ‘notoriously difficult to budget for’, so the firm is maintaining its figure at last years, which was £250,000, inclusive of interim levies.
The issue is perhaps confounded by a number of question marks over previous levies, particularly following the FSCS’s decision to pay back £71 million to fund management and investment intermediary firms which resubmitted their tariff data for 2010/11 – the year of the massive £336 million interim levy. This has created a shortfall in funding for compensation claims for this year, with firms facing an additional £36 million redistribution levy to cover the gap. Investment intermediaries also face an additional £25 million shortfall for 2012/13.
Administration charges doubled
Rising regulatory costs have caused Killik & Co to double its administrative charge for contract notes from £5 to £10 in order to recoup some of the cost. Having spent between £500,000 and £600,000 on FSCS levies over the fiscal year up to March 2012, Killik is budgeting for a similar expenditure on FSCS for 2013 as well. Founder Paul Killik notes that over the past two to three years the FSCS levy has averaged around 2% of revenues.
News sponsored by: