Twitter icon Email alerts icon Latest News RSS icon Magazine icon Stay connected:

View the article online at

Henderson set for public battle over Smithfield redevelopment

by Robert St George on Feb 10, 2014 at 15:20

Henderson set for public battle over Smithfield redevelopment

A public inquiry beginning tomorrow will pit Henderson Global Investors against Save Britain’s Heritage over the redevelopment of London’s Smithfield Market.

Henderson plans to turn the presently derelict Victorian market building into a retail and office complex, which would involve removing the market’s roof.

The scheme is supported by Boris Johnson, the City of London Corporation, English Heritage, and the Smithfield market tenants’ association.

However, it is opposed by Save Britain’s Heritage and the Victorian Society. Their campaign has secured backing from celebrities including Alan Bennett and Kristin Scott Thomas.

‘If you go to St Bartholomew’s and then walk through Smithfield, it is like walking from one cathedral to another. You wouldn’t pull down St Bartholomew’s, nor should you pull down Smithfield,’ said Bennett.

Scott Thomas added: ‘Smithfield general market is a beautiful example of Victorian architecture. We should be treasuring this part of our heritage. What the Paris developers did to Les Halles is remembered as an act of vandalism. Do we really want to be remembered as the generation who did the same thing to London?’

In response, Henderson cited a YouGov poll revealing that 54% of Londoners questioned believed that the Smithfield project should go ahead as soon as possible, with just 17% against.

‘These results show that Londoners support our scheme, which will save and bring back to life Victorian market buildings that have lain empty for decades. The clear majority recognise that Smithfield Quarter will change the area for the better, will be effective in retaining the Victorian appearance of the buildings and should go ahead as soon as possible,’ commented Geoff Harris, director of property development at Henderson.

‘The Victorians were good at change, yet it is striking that there is a tendency for some to represent change as threatening and unacceptable. By a clear margin most Londoners do not share this view and want to see us improve and regenerate the area as quickly as possible.

‘There is no realistic alternative to Smithfield Quarter and if our scheme does not get approved then these disused historic buildings will continue to decay, leaving the site blighted by further uncertainty.’

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

1 comment so far. Why not have your say?


Feb 11, 2014 at 13:57

54% of 1,100 people is hardly a mandate to deface such a beautiful space. I doubt half those approached knew what the hell was being asked of them.

When they canvas London's 7,500,000 population and get a 54% response rate I'll take notice.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Sponsored Video: Bringing it all back home

As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.

Today's top headlines

Investing for income in a changing environment

With talk on interest rates on the horizon, our latest roundtable debate covers income investing against a changing backdrop

More about this:


On the road

Click here to find out more from the Audience Development team.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet