Twitter icon Email alerts icon Latest News RSS icon Magazine icon Stay connected:

View the article online at

New City Initiative fights corner for SMEs on FSCS reform

by Danielle Levy on Aug 06, 2012 at 10:06

New City Initiative fights corner for SMEs on FSCS reform

The New City Initiative (NCI), a think tank backed by industry heavyweights including Stanhope and Odey, is taking the FSA to task on Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) reform.

Daniel Pinto (pictured), chairman of the NCI is concerned the regulatory burden for smaller wealth managers has been exacerbated by FSCS interim levies two years running, which represents a key issue that the NCI is engaging with the regulator on.

‘The absolute figure for everyone at the NCI is high, but also the unexpected nature of the FSCS is an issue,’ he said.

He proposes that asking firms to pay more each year towards the scheme and allowing for more of a buffer for future blow-ups rather than large fluctuating one-off payments could work better.

Speaking before the FSA issued proposals to review the FSCS funding model last week, in which it sought to reduce the likelihood of interim levies and offer firms more certainty on the level of fees they pay by eliminating cross-subsidies between asset managers and deposit takers.

Meanwhile, the regulator called for revised annual thresholds based on assessments of affordability and proposed a 50% FSCS funding rise for investment advisers, while investment managers would see their liabilities fall by £70 million. 

Meanwhile, the FSCS will consider potential compensation costs expected in the 36 months following the levy instead of twelve months as is currently the case.

Pinto also expressed his concerns about the impact of rising regulatory costs for smaller businesses, particularly over the longer term.

‘I understand why this is happening. Obviously compliance requirements have dramatically increased since 2008. However, this phenomena is putting small-to-medium-size enterprises (SMEs) in the financial sector in a difficult position. Banks can still pay these fees, but for SMEs it is tough,’ he said, estimating his firm Stanhope spends about 5% of its revenues on regulation.


1 comment so far. Why not have your say?

david mann

Aug 06, 2012 at 11:16

spending 5% of your revenues in regulation does not seem excessive- in many industrues it is well over 10%

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Sponsored Video: Bringing it all back home

As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.

Today's top headlines

Investing for income in a changing environment

With talk on interest rates on the horizon, our latest roundtable debate covers income investing against a changing backdrop

On the road

Click here to find out more from the Audience Development team.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet