Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

Apcims: 'messy' and 'confusing' RDR should allow grandfathering

3 Comments
Apcims: 'messy' and 'confusing' RDR should allow grandfathering

The Association of Private Client Investment Managers and Stockbrokers (Apcims), disapproves of the FSA's decision to not allow grandfathering for the retail distribution review (RDR) and questions whether adviser charging will bring enough transparency.

Apcims' chief Tim May said that while the trade body supports many of the RDR's aims, such as greater professionalism, it believes there are missed opportunities. He said the lack of grandfathering as part of the regulation will mean that clients lose 'trusted, experienced advisers across the market place'.

May described aspects of the RDR as 'messy and confusing' from the consumer's perspective and expect modification may be necessary later down the line. For example, he questions whether the FSA's proposals to introduce transparent charging for advice really extends to full transparency and asks whether consumers fully understand fund pricing.

May also pointed to potential discrepancies between the RDR and the oncoming Mifid II and the potential for amendments to some of the key points underpinning the RDR.

'MIFID II remains the elephant in the room as there is no equivalent concept of restricted advisers in the text and trail commission is, in the latest parliamentary text, proposed to be disclosed but not necessarily banned for both discretionary portfolios and advice – the exact opposite to RDR. Submissions have been made to protect RDR and the latest Council text bans all trail, but no-one knows where this will end up.'

In a similar vein, the trade body also highlights a growing regulatory burden which its members are facing, and said a 'positive move in the change over to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) would be to mirror the successful government initiative of ‘one in one out’ - or even ‘one in two out’ - for regulations'.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Mark Barnett - part 2: why I'm not buying Lloyds

Mark Barnett - part 2: why I'm not buying Lloyds

In the second part of our exclusive video interview, Barnett explains why he has no intention of buying Lloyds, and where he sees the greatest income opportunities.

Play Wealth managers reveal the best investment ideas of the year

Wealth managers reveal the best investment ideas of the year

From robotics to impact investing, wealth managers share the best ideas they have heard this year.

Play Baillie Gifford's Earnshaw on Xi Jinping's 'new era'

Baillie Gifford's Earnshaw on Xi Jinping's 'new era'

Sophie Earnshaw talks through what Xi Jinping's 'new era' means for investors. and why Chinese tech offers some of best growth stocks in the world.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: JM Finn on why the future is with financial planners

Profile: JM Finn on why the future is with financial planners

There is a lot of work on pension consolidation and Sipps have been a big driver there, says JM Finn chief executive

Wealth Manager on Twitter