Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register free for our breaking news email alerts with analysis and cutting edge commentary from our award winning team. Registration only takes a minute.

Apcims: 'messy' and 'confusing' RDR should allow grandfathering

3 Comments
Apcims: 'messy' and 'confusing' RDR should allow grandfathering

The Association of Private Client Investment Managers and Stockbrokers (Apcims), disapproves of the FSA's decision to not allow grandfathering for the retail distribution review (RDR) and questions whether adviser charging will bring enough transparency.

Apcims' chief Tim May said that while the trade body supports many of the RDR's aims, such as greater professionalism, it believes there are missed opportunities. He said the lack of grandfathering as part of the regulation will mean that clients lose 'trusted, experienced advisers across the market place'.

May described aspects of the RDR as 'messy and confusing' from the consumer's perspective and expect modification may be necessary later down the line. For example, he questions whether the FSA's proposals to introduce transparent charging for advice really extends to full transparency and asks whether consumers fully understand fund pricing.

May also pointed to potential discrepancies between the RDR and the oncoming Mifid II and the potential for amendments to some of the key points underpinning the RDR.

'MIFID II remains the elephant in the room as there is no equivalent concept of restricted advisers in the text and trail commission is, in the latest parliamentary text, proposed to be disclosed but not necessarily banned for both discretionary portfolios and advice – the exact opposite to RDR. Submissions have been made to protect RDR and the latest Council text bans all trail, but no-one knows where this will end up.'

In a similar vein, the trade body also highlights a growing regulatory burden which its members are facing, and said a 'positive move in the change over to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) would be to mirror the successful government initiative of ‘one in one out’ - or even ‘one in two out’ - for regulations'.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Boutique tapes: my business will never be sold

Boutique tapes: my business will never be sold

In the final part of our four part series we discuss consolidation and whether it's getting tougher for boutiques to survive.

Play Boutique tapes: are top managers better off at small firms?

Boutique tapes: are top managers better off at small firms?

In episode three of our series, boutique bosses discuss whether the best fund managers are more likely to thrive at smaller firms.

Play Boutique tapes: if you want a Ferrari, you have to pay for it

Boutique tapes: if you want a Ferrari, you have to pay for it

In the second part of our four-part series, boutique bosses are asked how they can justify the fees charged by active managers.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: how this boutique beat the big guns of wealth

Profile: how this boutique beat the big guns of wealth

This small west country offshoot of a local IFA scooped a 2018 Citywire award from beneath the noses of the national challengers

Wealth Manager on Twitter