In another move to bolster its securities lending practices, BlackRock is now also indemnifying the funds.
The asset manager’s securities lending programme means extra revenue can be generated from BlackRock lending out the ETFs’ underlying securities, with 60% of this revenue paid back to the fund, to the benefit of the investor.
However, despite the revenue generated, some investors have aired concerns over the counterparty risk caused by securities lending, the relative opacity surrounding the nature of the party to which BlackRock is lending and the amount that is lent out in each ETF.
For example, some ETFs have lent out a significant portion of their underlyings, with certain funds lending out as much as 90% of their securities, while holding Italian and Japanese equities as collateral.
At the end of last year, iShares showed its FTSE 250 ETFs had lent out 92% of its securities on average over the course of a year. At one point, the maximum it had lent out was 95%.
The returns garnered from lending out this ETF’s securities, though, generated a net figure of 14.7 basis points for the fund.
Under the new securities lending regime, a 50% limit is imposed on the amount lent out in each fund, even though BlackRock said it has the capacity to lend out a lot more.
Joe Linhares, head of iShares EMEA, said: ‘We listened to our iShares clients’ feedback and whilst clients appreciate the additional returns received from securities lending and are comfortable with our risk management process, clients said they would be more comfortable with limiting lending to 50% of a fund.
‘So whilst we continue to believe that we can manage large on-loan percentages where there is borrowing demand and our institutional client base does not have the same concerns as iShares clients, we have taken our client’s feedback on board and apply a 50% limit for iShares funds.’
He said on average, 20% of the iShares funds lent out, so the 50% fund level limit will impact only a small number of funds in the range.
Linhares added: ‘The vast majority of our funds are not impacted and will not forego securities lending revenue as a result of this change.
He said BlackRock’s view continues to be that lending more than 50% of a fund’s assets can be beneficial from a risk/return perspective for clients.
Additionally BlackRock will indemnify the ETFs should a borrower default.
‘Whilst we continue to believe that the strong risk management framework surrounding our securities lending programme delivers the protection clients need, we formalise the confidence we have in our risk management capabilities and explicitly provide an indemnity against borrower default,’ said Linhares.
This means while the majority of returns are passed on to the client, BlackRock now bears the risk in case of borrower default.
‘The indemnity will come at a cost to BlackRock, but we will not pass on these costs to our clients. So the indemnity does not increase the costs for our clients and we are not planning to change the securities lending revenue sharing arrangements in place.’