Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

Carmignac: paying for research will hurt fund firms

Carmignac: paying for research will hurt fund firms

French asset manager Carmignac has said Europe’s fund industry will be making itself uncompetitive with US rivals if the trend towards absorbing research payment costs continues.

In a statement to our sister publication Citywire Selector, the company said it had and would not waiver from this stance.

This is light of some firms, such as Janus Henderson, at first announcing plans to charge investors before reversing this and stating they would absorb the cost themselves.

Carmignac said it had prepared for and is ready to provide the transparency of research costs according to MiFID II objectives, which come into effect at the start of 2018.

It said: ‘This approach has three significant benefits: additional cost transparency for end investors, ensures the maintenance of wide coverage of European mid-cap companies which are the core of economic growth, and retains low barriers to entry for new asset management companies.’

Commenting on the decision to charge, Carmignac said many companies had been ‘provoked by some ETF fund managers’ to attempt to become cost competitive. However, it said it would be holding firm on its stance.

‘If this becomes the market standard, it will disadvantage European active asset management houses against the US based asset managers, and Europe will lose the three benefits of transparency, research coverage and low barriers to entry.’

‘Whatever the industry as a whole decides, as an active management house with an independent business and mind-set, we will continue to value the cross-fertilization of in-house research with external research.  

‘We will continue to nurture this model, which is central to our investment approach, and we will keep growing our internal team of analysts both on the fixed income and equity sides.’

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Mark Barnett - part 2: why I'm not buying Lloyds

Mark Barnett - part 2: why I'm not buying Lloyds

In the second part of our exclusive video interview, Barnett explains why he has no intention of buying Lloyds, and where he sees the greatest income opportunities.

Play Wealth managers reveal the best investment ideas of the year

Wealth managers reveal the best investment ideas of the year

From robotics to impact investing, wealth managers share the best ideas they have heard this year.

Play Baillie Gifford's Earnshaw on Xi Jinping's 'new era'

Baillie Gifford's Earnshaw on Xi Jinping's 'new era'

Sophie Earnshaw talks through what Xi Jinping's 'new era' means for investors. and why Chinese tech offers some of best growth stocks in the world.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: JM Finn on why the future is with financial planners

Profile: JM Finn on why the future is with financial planners

There is a lot of work on pension consolidation and Sipps have been a big driver there, says JM Finn chief executive

Wealth Manager on Twitter