Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to all of Citywire’s Fund Manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

Cass: wealth firms fear hidden costs of FCA interest payment call

2 comments
Cass: wealth firms fear hidden costs of FCA interest payment call

FCA proposals to no longer allow companies to share interest on client monies could hit wealth management firms’ incomes, according to a leading consultant.

The proposals form part of the FCA’s consultation paper on CASS rules aimed at improving the client assets regime, and follow a raft of fines in the sector. The measures seek to ensure all firms follow the alternative approach to client money rules so that all client money must be received directly into a client bank account.

This means no client money would be received into the firm’s own accounts, preventing firms from making payments from these into client bank accounts. The paper also proposes a ban on using ‘unbreakable’ fixed term deposits to safeguard against the fallout from insolvencies, warning failure to comply with the rules could result in ‘hefty fines’.

Ongoing costs associated with complying with the new rules for the asset management, broking and wealth management segments are an estimated £2.49 million, with one-off costs of £383,000.

However, Karen Bond, a director at Walbrook Partners, warns these costs could be ‘much more expensive’, as the industry would still have to deal with any hidden costs.

She also warns the proposal that firms either keep interest on client money in its entirety, with the client’s agreement, or not at all, with no option to share, will mean a cut in margins for wealth managers. The regulator hopes the measures will ensure clients receive interest they are entitled to.

‘Many managers take a percentage of the deposit rate and give the rest to their clients. The agreed rate with the clients represents quite a substantial part of some firms’ margins. Some firms could lose significant income, if cutting off interest from their clients altogether is unacceptable to them,’ she said. ‘The proposal at the moment doesn’t really allow that sharing mechanism, it’s either all or nothing, which is not great news for flexibility.’

Yvonne Clough, head of risk at Multrees Investor Services, said increased costs could also come from the focus on the speed of returning assets. This would result in an ‘even more stringent’ monitoring of the format of reconciliations or quality of data, and additional audit and reporting costs.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Navigating geopolitical risk with ETFs

Navigating geopolitical risk with ETFs

ETFGI’s Deborah Fuhr on how investors can use exchange-traded funds to position their portfolio.

Play Sarasin’s Boucher: why I like salmon with chocolate

Sarasin’s Boucher: why I like salmon with chocolate

Henry Boucher, manager of the £129 million Sarasin Food & Agriculture Opportunities fund, explains why he is gobbling up salmon and chocolate stocks.

Play Alibaba hype, the UK slowdown and opportunities in European sovereign bonds

Alibaba hype, the UK slowdown and opportunities in European sovereign bonds

Libby Ashby and leading wealth managers analyse what the Alibaba IPO hype means for Chinese equities, slowing growth of the UK economy and whether there’s anything left to play for in the European sovereign bond market.

Wealth Manager on Twitter