Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register free for our breaking news email alerts with analysis and cutting edge commentary from our award winning team. Registration only takes a minute.

Did the MPC force Carney's hand on rates?

Did the MPC force Carney's hand on rates?

Bank of England governor Mark Carney took almost everyone by surprise last week when he stated that UK interest rates could rise earlier than markets think.

Up to now, he has used ‘forward guidance’ – a policy innovation introduced with much fanfare last August – to signal that rates would remain lower than normal for longer than usual, given the need for a period of repair in the economy. Indeed, this was still his message only a month ago, when presenting the Bank’s latest Inflation Report forecasts.

So what has changed in the intervening month? Three possible explanations spring to mind: the pace of recovery; the effectiveness of other policies for slowing the economy; and finally, a substantial shift in the debate within the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC).

The first explanation is not convincing. Other than some stronger-than-expected labour market figures – and even there, pay pressures remain strikingly subdued – the data have come in broadly as expected.

As for the second, it is possible that the governor is getting cold feet on macro-prudential policy tools. Carney did admit in last week’s speech that macro-prudential policies could not be used as a substitute for interest-rate increases; previously, he may have at least given the impression that they could. As their introduction draws near, Carney may have been reading up on the track record of macro-prudential tools, which would give even their most ardent supporter some pause for thought (a recent study from the Bank for International Settlements found that their effectiveness has been patchy at best).

As for the MPC debate, until we see the minutes on Wednesday, this must be the strongest candidate to explain the change in messaging from the Governor on the timing of that first rate rise. Following his speech last week, markets responded by bringing forward their expectations on the timing of that first rate rise to late this year; if we find that one or more MPC members was seriously contemplating a vote in favour of higher rates this month, markets could bring that expectation forward further still.

Carney, along with other MPC members, has stated repeatedly that it is not the timing of the first rate rise that matters for the economy, but the medium-term path of rates. In one sense this is a fair point, and his (and the MPC’s) message has so far not changed on that medium-term path – rates are set to remain lower than pre-crisis ‘norms’ over the next few years, as the economy continues its slow process of repair. We do not expect any change in this message in the MPC’s minutes.

In another sense, however, it seems a little disingenuous to play down the timing issue. Rates have been unchanged now for over five years; it is only natural that markets - and savers, and borrowers - should focus on when a break-out from that long-standing pattern is likely to take place. Furthermore, forward guidance was designed not only to dampen expectations of how high rates might rise in the medium term, but also to underline the message that the first increase would not come for a long time – initially, it is worth remembering, in the second half of 2016. If rates are to start rising as much as two years sooner than the governor was signalling only last summer, it should not come as a surprise to the MPC that this timing issue remains a matter of interest.

Lucy O’Carroll is chief economist – investment solutions at Aberdeen Asset Management.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Boutique tapes: my business will never be sold

Boutique tapes: my business will never be sold

In the final part of our four part series we discuss consolidation and whether it's getting tougher for boutiques to survive.

Play Boutique tapes: are top managers better off at small firms?

Boutique tapes: are top managers better off at small firms?

In episode three of our series, boutique bosses discuss whether the best fund managers are more likely to thrive at smaller firms.

Play Boutique tapes: if you want a Ferrari, you have to pay for it

Boutique tapes: if you want a Ferrari, you have to pay for it

In the second part of our four-part series, boutique bosses are asked how they can justify the fees charged by active managers.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: how this boutique beat the big guns of wealth

Profile: how this boutique beat the big guns of wealth

This small west country offshoot of a local IFA scooped a 2018 Citywire award from beneath the noses of the national challengers

Wealth Manager on Twitter