Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to all of Citywire’s Fund Manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

FSA censures Capita Financial Managers for Arch cru failings

1 comment
FSA censures Capita Financial Managers for Arch cru failings

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has issued a public censure against Capita Financial Managers Limited (CFM) for its failings in relation to the CF Arch cru funds.

CFM is the authorised corporate director of the CF Arch cru funds, a role which the FSA said carries ‘important regulatory responsibilities for the protection and fair treatment of investors.’

However, in July 2006, CFM delegated the investment management of the funds to a third party – Arch Financial Products.

These funds were then invested indirectly in private finance and private equity assets.

Although CFM delegated the investment management to Arch, it still remained responsible for the regulatory obligations.

The FSA said: ‘CFM failed in aspects of its oversight of Arch. CFM did not have sufficient processes in place to monitor Arch, even though Arch had not acted as an investment manager before.

‘CFM did not adequately identify and mitigate the conflicts of interest between Arch and the funds that arose as a result of the CF Arch cru structure, which involved a complex network of onshore and offshore companies and private market investments.’

The watchdog said CFM also failed to monitor the liquidity risks of the funds. The funds were then suspended in March 2009 as a result of concerns that there was insufficient liquidity.

Furthermore, once the funds were suspended, it became clear that their investments were not in fact as valuable as CFM had understood them to be.

A £54 million payment scheme was voluntarily established in June 2011 by CFM, Bank of New York Mellon Trust and Depositary and HSBC Bank for investors.

CFM required the financial support of its ultimate parent, Capita Group plc, to make its £32 million contribution to that payment scheme. 

However, CFM could not fund both such a substantial contribution to the payment scheme and a financial penalty. This was taken into account in the FSA’s decision not to impose a financial penalty on CFM. 

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Navigating geopolitical risk with ETFs

Navigating geopolitical risk with ETFs

ETFGI’s Deborah Fuhr on how investors can use exchange-traded funds to position their portfolio.

Play Sarasin’s Boucher: why I like salmon with chocolate

Sarasin’s Boucher: why I like salmon with chocolate

Henry Boucher, manager of the £129 million Sarasin Food & Agriculture Opportunities fund, explains why he is gobbling up salmon and chocolate stocks.

Play Alibaba hype, the UK slowdown and opportunities in European sovereign bonds

Alibaba hype, the UK slowdown and opportunities in European sovereign bonds

Libby Ashby and leading wealth managers analyse what the Alibaba IPO hype means for Chinese equities, slowing growth of the UK economy and whether there’s anything left to play for in the European sovereign bond market.

Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: How David Esfandi is shaping Canaccord Genuity WM

Profile: How David Esfandi is shaping Canaccord Genuity WM

After six months as chief executive of Canaccord Genuity David Esfandi's ambitions are taking shape

Wealth Manager on Twitter