Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

FSA fines stockbroker £8m for the 'most serious’ market abuse

FSA fines stockbroker £8m for the 'most serious’ market abuse

The Financial Services Authority has fined Swift Trade £8 million for what it described to be the most 'serious' case of market abuse of its kind.

The penalty represents the largest it has ever issued against a firm for market manipulation.

The Upper Tribunal gave the watchdog the green light to impose the fine on the non-FSA authorised Canadian firm, which has global operations.

Between January 2007 and 2008, Swift Trade was said to be part of a ‘systematic and deliberate’ form of manipulate trading, called layering.

The layering caused small price movements in a wide range of individual shares on the London Stock Exchange, from which Swift Trade captured substantial profits.

The trading involved tens of thousands of orders by individual traders which led to a false view of supply and demand, as well as an artificial share price.

When Swift Trade became aware the exchange had raised concerns in March 2007, the firm moved to evade restrictions on its trading by enhancing its trading pattern, so as to not be detected.

For example, the firm changed its direct market access provider, which allows investors to place buy and sell orders directly on the order book.

Swift Trade argued its trading was not market abuse, because its orders were in derivatives not shares, which were hedged in shares on exchange.

However, the Tribunal dismissed the argument and said the derivative orders were placed in the knowledge the direct market access providers would immediately match them with hedging orders in shares.

The Tribunal concluded the evidence pointed ‘very much’ to the conclusion that Swift Trade’s officers and managers knew that its conduct was not legitimate and that they actively encouraged it.

Tracey McDermott, FSA director of enforcement and financial crime said: ‘This was a particularly cynical case where a business model was based on market abuse.

'The approach taken by Swift Trade was novel and complex, designed to allow them to benefit at the expense of other market users, and to make detection more difficult.’

She added: ‘We urge other market participants to take note of this judgment which makes it clear that layering is abusive. We expect brokers and DMA providers to ensure that their clients implement appropriate controls to monitor their clients’ trading activity closely to ensure that it is not abusive, and to report suspicious transactions.’

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Brewin's Gutteridge: Yuan direction

Brewin's Gutteridge: Yuan direction

This week Brewin Dolphin's research head chats to Fidelity Asian Investment Directors Jenny Lee and Gary Monaghan about the big changes in China.

Play On the Road Challenge: horsing around on the polo pitch

On the Road Challenge: horsing around on the polo pitch

Libby Ashby takes to the polo pitch with Stuart Leigh-Davies from Redmayne-Bentley for an 'On the Road' challenge.

Brewin's Gutteridge: where Miton's Godber sees value

Brewin's Gutteridge: where Miton's Godber sees value

This week Brewin Dolphin's research head talks to George Godber, co-lead fund manager of the Miton UK Value Opportunities fund, about value investing.

Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: what tempted Brewin's Glasgow team over to Rathbones?

Profile: what tempted Brewin's Glasgow team over to Rathbones?

Rathbones’ Glasgow office has only been open for three months but the team, led by Angus Kerr, has already attracted new clients

Wealth Manager on Twitter