Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register free for our breaking news email alerts with analysis and cutting edge commentary from our award winning team. Registration only takes a minute.

IMA and Apcims call for sweeping FSCS review

4 Comments
IMA and Apcims call for sweeping FSCS review

The Investment Management Association (IMA) and the Association of Private Client Investment Managers and Stockbrokers (Apcims) have strongly opposed the regulator's proposed changes to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).

The trade bodies argue a much broader review is needed to tackle the wide range of issues.  

They have joined forces to argue that the proposals unveiled earlier this year do not cover the impact of cross-subsidy, particularly when asset managers had to find £233 million to contribute to the £333 million needed in 2011 for intermediary defaults.

'Any wider review must consider the appropriateness of recovering extremely high levels of compensation claims. The IMA and Apcims would expect the FSA to consider whether improvements can be made to the supervisory processes to mitigate the risk of future claims,' the bodies said.

While few debate the need for the FSCS, many discretionaries and asset managers feel that at times the payment can be too high, and penalises the parts of the industry that adhere to the rules, rather than the pockets which do not.

Moreover, after the suprise rise in FSCS some 12 months ago to compensate for the Keydata failings, a number of firms feel they have tobudget for payouts they are unable to accurately assess.

Guy Sears (pictured), IMA director of wholesale, said that more needs to be done to assess the needs of the industry when it comes to the FSCS.

'We’re disappointed to see that the bulk of the proposal concentrates on improving administrative processes within the FSCS at a time when the scheme rules need a complete overhaul,' he said.

Ian Cornwall, Apcims director of regulation, added: 'The proposals appear to address a limited number of ad hoc issues associated with the FSCS and it is unclear why it has been published now given a further consultation paper on the FSCS is due to be published shortly. Certain issues, such as the definitions of eligible claimants, addressed in the current consultation paper may also need to be revisited in the further consultation.'

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Boutique tapes: my business will never be sold

Boutique tapes: my business will never be sold

In the final part of our four part series we discuss consolidation and whether it's getting tougher for boutiques to survive.

Play Boutique tapes: are top managers better off at small firms?

Boutique tapes: are top managers better off at small firms?

In episode three of our series, boutique bosses discuss whether the best fund managers are more likely to thrive at smaller firms.

Play Boutique tapes: if you want a Ferrari, you have to pay for it

Boutique tapes: if you want a Ferrari, you have to pay for it

In the second part of our four-part series, boutique bosses are asked how they can justify the fees charged by active managers.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: how this boutique beat the big guns of wealth

Profile: how this boutique beat the big guns of wealth

This small west country offshoot of a local IFA scooped a 2018 Citywire award from beneath the noses of the national challengers

Wealth Manager on Twitter