Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register free for our breaking news email alerts with analysis and cutting edge commentary from our award winning team. Registration only takes a minute.

IT Insider: Why F&C Managed is the leading choice for growth & income

IT Insider: Why F&C Managed is the leading choice for growth & income

Looking at the performance of the global fund of funds sector, it is remarkable how well the two F&C Managed Portfolio funds, managed by Peter Hewitt, are doing relative to their peer group. Many of these have defensive portfolios but this does not account for all of F&C’s recent outperformance. They are not big funds – the income pool has a market cap of £23 million and the growth pool £21 million, but in my view they ought to be a lot bigger.

There are quite a few quoted funds of funds out there. The largest is British Empire (market cap: £837 million). Managed by John Pennink, it has an impressive long-term track record. Then there is the £174 million market cap JP Morgan Elect Managed Growth Fund, managed by Katy Thorneycroft, which is predominantly invested in other JPM funds. SVM Global, managed by Colin McLean and Donald Robertson, has a market cap of £164 million. If we discount New Star Investment Trust (59% owned by John Duffield), SVM Global is the only one to sit on a material discount (14.7%). World Trust Fund, managed by Kun Deng at Lazard, is the only other fund to break the £100 million barrier.

The two F&C funds have returned around 25% over the past year in net asset value (NAV) terms, about 3.5% ahead of British Empire and JP Morgan Elect, 7.5% ahead of World Trust and 9.5% ahead of SVM Global. Both F&C portfolios are more heavily weighted to the UK than the peer group but this might reflect their FTSE All-Share benchmark. They are quite diversified, with a minimum of 25 investments in each pool.

The funds originated as a savings plan, listing in April 2008 after 95% of investors elected to convert their holdings into shares in the funds. Legally they are one company but have discrete portfolios. This is not a split capital trust and there are no limits on the ratio of income shares to growth shares. Shareholders can switch between the funds annually at minimal cost. The board can impose maximum and minimum limits on the amount converting.

There is a discount control mechanism in place on the funds; they will buy in stock if the discount exceeds 5% in normal market conditions. With both trading happily at a small premium to NAV they haven’t used the buy-back facility recently but have done so in the past. Shares are bought into Treasury and can be reissued at a profit if demand picks up – the F&C funds are part of a select band of investment companies who have successfully managed this.

The income fund pays quarterly dividends and trades at over a 4% yield. Income arising on the growth pool is effectively acquired by the income pool in exchange for a capital payment to the growth pool. I am not sure what they would do if the growth pool ended up being significantly larger than the income pool but guess they would ask the shareholders’ permission to cap the amount of income acquired. The portfolios largely consist of holdings in well-known names. The largest in the growth pool is a stake in British Empire and in the income pool it is British Assets. Turnover is fairly low.

Yes the total expense ratio (TER) may be higher than average because of the double layering of charges but, after fees, both pools have managed to outperform all but three of the directly invested global funds over the past year. High TERs are only a problem with poorly performing funds and those investing in low return assets.

The only element of the structure I am unhappy with is that F&C operates the same scaling up of shares not voted by savings plan holders that was widely condemned and withdrawn by Alliance Trust. It seems this is an ideal vehicle for private shareholders wanting a simple choice between investing for growth or income. It would be great if F&C could expand the trust.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Related Fund Managers

Peter Hewitt
Peter Hewitt
13/74 in Mixed Assets - Flexible GBP (Performance over 3 years) Average Total Return: 26.04%
Colin McLean
Colin McLean
39/151 in Equity - UK (All Companies) (Performance over 3 years) Average Total Return: 22.85%
Katy Thorneycroft
Katy Thorneycroft
171/441 in Equity - Global (Performance over 3 years) Average Total Return: 30.33%
Donald Robertson
Donald Robertson
Citywire TV
Play Boutique tapes: my business will never be sold

Boutique tapes: my business will never be sold

In the final part of our four part series we discuss consolidation and whether it's getting tougher for boutiques to survive.

Play Boutique tapes: are top managers better off at small firms?

Boutique tapes: are top managers better off at small firms?

In episode three of our series, boutique bosses discuss whether the best fund managers are more likely to thrive at smaller firms.

Play Boutique tapes: if you want a Ferrari, you have to pay for it

Boutique tapes: if you want a Ferrari, you have to pay for it

In the second part of our four-part series, boutique bosses are asked how they can justify the fees charged by active managers.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: how this boutique beat the big guns of wealth

Profile: how this boutique beat the big guns of wealth

This small west country offshoot of a local IFA scooped a 2018 Citywire award from beneath the noses of the national challengers

Wealth Manager on Twitter