Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

Managers demand post-RDR trail clarity from VCT providers

Managers demand post-RDR trail clarity from VCT providers

Wealth managers are calling for venture capital trust (VCT) providers to disclose their retail distribution review (RDR) charging structures, as fears mount that an unlevel playing field will be created between advised and non-advised clients.

Their calls come as few VCT providers are understood to have come out with clean charging structures ahead of the RDR deadline of 1 January. This means advised clients will be paying the same for the product as clients of execution-only brokers – with the latter able to take on trail commission post-RDR.

‘Effectively advised clients will be subsidising commission payments made to non-advised discount brokers and execution only businesses,’ said Richard Hancock, technical operations manager and chief investment officer at the Financial Management Bureau.

‘I have raised the issue with our chosen providers for VCTs and made it clear that we are very unhappy with this situation and would have to review our panel and chosen partners in the new year. Alternatively, we would be looking for managers to make an equivalent rebate from the initial charges for advised clients.’

An FSA spokeswoman said product providers were under no obligation to promote details of their RDR-ready charging structures before 1 January, providing appropriate fees are in place on the day the RDR comes in to effect.

‘They wouldn’t necessarily have to announce them according to our rules,’ she said. ‘The advisers will have to make a decision that considers cost and something that has got commission stripped out is going to be more cost effective for the client.’

Investec Wealth & Investment’s Nick Sketch said while he disagreed with product providers taking trail commission, part of the trouble with VCTs is that many are too small, and the costs of rejigging their charging structures could be prohibitive.

‘If you have a VCT that is £15 million – and quite a few of them are – how much benefit do you think you are going to get making a change if you are going to spend £500,000 on legal fees to do it?’

Meanwhile, independent VCT specialist Jeremy Spencer described the reticence of VCT providers in arranging clean share classes as ‘yet another unintended consequence of RDR’.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Mark Barnett - part 2: why I'm not buying Lloyds

Mark Barnett - part 2: why I'm not buying Lloyds

In the second part of our exclusive video interview, Barnett explains why he has no intention of buying Lloyds, and where he sees the greatest income opportunities.

Play Wealth managers reveal the best investment ideas of the year

Wealth managers reveal the best investment ideas of the year

From robotics to impact investing, wealth managers share the best ideas they have heard this year.

Play Baillie Gifford's Earnshaw on Xi Jinping's 'new era'

Baillie Gifford's Earnshaw on Xi Jinping's 'new era'

Sophie Earnshaw talks through what Xi Jinping's 'new era' means for investors. and why Chinese tech offers some of best growth stocks in the world.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: JM Finn on why the future is with financial planners

Profile: JM Finn on why the future is with financial planners

There is a lot of work on pension consolidation and Sipps have been a big driver there, says JM Finn chief executive

Wealth Manager on Twitter