Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to all of Citywire’s Fund Manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

Neil Woodford v Mark Barnett: how do their numbers compare?

Neil Woodford v Mark Barnett: how do their numbers compare?

Investment is famously motivated by a balance between fear and greed: Neil Woodford’s investors were in many cases in his fund because they appreciated his ability to walk the line between the two.

His flagship mandate, the £14 billion Invesco Perpetual High Income fund, has returned 208% since 1999 versus an IMA UK Equity Income return of 66%. Over that period his deepest drawdown has been -17.49% versus a peer average figure of -23.38%.

That lack of volatility was enough for many investors to forgive the fact that for much of the time within that period – particularly since the 2009 bounce – his compound annual return has run below peer-average.  

Can his replacement Mark Barnett replicate those numbers? Over the last 10 years Barnett lags Woodford by 197% to 218%. He knocks the peer average of 119% out of the ring however.

Over five years – a period in which Woodford has proved resistant to much of the high market-beta momentum which has carried other managers – the situation is reversed, with Barnett returning 90% to 72% versus the peer average of 65.9%.

Over time, Barnett’s drawdown has consistently run a few basis points below Woodford’s – for instance in the depths of 2008 he recorded a maximum discreet loss of 19.89% versus -17.49%.

But equally in recent years he has consistently offered higher compound annual returns – particularly since the beginning of this year as markets have rallied hard globally.

So occasionally more return, consistently a little more risk – although given that is relative to one of the safest pairs of hands in UK equity management, that is probably not cause to start panic selling.   

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play JPM’s Negyal: Back divis to temper EM volatility

JPM’s Negyal: Back divis to temper EM volatility

Omar Negyal, co-manager of the JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Income trust, says a dividend approach to emerging markets reduces the volatility of investing in the asset class.

Play WMR: Why Russia will lose this war

WMR: Why Russia will lose this war

Author and journalist Adam Lebor believes a perfect storm is brewing when it comes to the Russian economy. .

Play WMR: Gerard Lyons warns Asia is the real risk, not Russia & Ukraine

WMR: Gerard Lyons warns Asia is the real risk, not Russia & Ukraine

Chief economic adviser to London mayor Boris Johnson outlines the geo-political risks in Asia and explains why the risk of another eurozone crisis must not be underestimated.

Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: 'new normal' now is as dangerous as when it was applied to tech

Profile: 'new normal' now is as dangerous as when it was applied to tech

7IM's CIO Chris Darbyshire says he has been re-energised by his new role, but has little time for 'new normal' doom-mongers

Wealth Manager on Twitter