Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

Neil Woodford v Mark Barnett: how do their numbers compare?

Neil Woodford v Mark Barnett: how do their numbers compare?

Investment is famously motivated by a balance between fear and greed: Neil Woodford’s investors were in many cases in his fund because they appreciated his ability to walk the line between the two.

His flagship mandate, the £14 billion Invesco Perpetual High Income fund, has returned 208% since 1999 versus an IMA UK Equity Income return of 66%. Over that period his deepest drawdown has been -17.49% versus a peer average figure of -23.38%.

That lack of volatility was enough for many investors to forgive the fact that for much of the time within that period – particularly since the 2009 bounce – his compound annual return has run below peer-average.  

Can his replacement Mark Barnett replicate those numbers? Over the last 10 years Barnett lags Woodford by 197% to 218%. He knocks the peer average of 119% out of the ring however.

Over five years – a period in which Woodford has proved resistant to much of the high market-beta momentum which has carried other managers – the situation is reversed, with Barnett returning 90% to 72% versus the peer average of 65.9%.

Over time, Barnett’s drawdown has consistently run a few basis points below Woodford’s – for instance in the depths of 2008 he recorded a maximum discreet loss of 19.89% versus -17.49%.

But equally in recent years he has consistently offered higher compound annual returns – particularly since the beginning of this year as markets have rallied hard globally.

So occasionally more return, consistently a little more risk – although given that is relative to one of the safest pairs of hands in UK equity management, that is probably not cause to start panic selling.   

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Wealth Manager Retreat 2017: size isn't everything

Wealth Manager Retreat 2017: size isn't everything

We asked our delegates at the Wealth Manager Retreat what they think about the recent wave of consolidation in the industry.

1 Comment Play CIO Tapes - part 3: 'passive funds are anti-capitalist'

CIO Tapes - part 3: 'passive funds are anti-capitalist'

Citywire recently gathered three of the UK's leading fund investment heads to discuss their hopes, fears and the issues that their jobs throw at them daily.

Play CIO Tapes: do investors have it as good as it gets?

CIO Tapes: do investors have it as good as it gets?

Citywire gathered three of the UK's leading fund investment heads to discuss what they fear and what makes them cheer about the year ahead

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: Rathbone's Newcastle boss on the road to £1bn

Profile: Rathbone's Newcastle boss on the road to £1bn

Starting from zero assets on day one, Rathbone's Newcastle team now looks after just over £400 million in clients money

Wealth Manager on Twitter