Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

PRA slams banks and insurers with £11m section 166 costs

PRA slams banks and insurers with £11m section 166 costs

The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued section 166 orders 33 times since it was set up last April hitting banks and insurers with £11.4 million costs.

In its first report and accounts for the 11 months to the end of February, the PRA said the number of section 166s rose from 27 the previous year although the cost of these fell from £14.7 million in 2012/13.

Nearly half or 16 of the section 166s focused on governance, controls and risk management frameworks, with eight on prudential matters for insurance, seven for deposit takers and clearing houses and two over data and IT infrastructure concerns.

The cost per report ranged from £14,602 to £1.3 million, compared to £33,795 to £3 million in the previous year.

‘Section 166 of FSMA provides a regulatory tool which gives the PRA the powers to obtain an outside expert view of aspects of a firm’s activities that, for example, cause concern or where further analysis is required,’ the banking regulator said.

Overall the PRA spent £202 million of its full year equivalent budget of £230 million. The biggest single cost was the BoE management fee of £59 million, followed by regulatory operations at £42 million, and banking and insurance supervision at £32 million and £30 million, respectively. Transition costs weighed in at £9 million. It has current assets of £33.1 million.

Looking more closely at the PRA, at the end of February, it had 1,045 staff and a staff turnover rate of 11.6% compared to 8.1% for the Bank of England in total. Chief executive Andrew Bailey (pictured) received total remuneration of £340,421 of which £253,127 was his base salary.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Mark Barnett - part 2: why I'm not buying Lloyds

Mark Barnett - part 2: why I'm not buying Lloyds

In the second part of our exclusive video interview, Barnett explains why he has no intention of buying Lloyds, and where he sees the greatest income opportunities.

Play Wealth managers reveal the best investment ideas of the year

Wealth managers reveal the best investment ideas of the year

From robotics to impact investing, wealth managers share the best ideas they have heard this year.

Play Baillie Gifford's Earnshaw on Xi Jinping's 'new era'

Baillie Gifford's Earnshaw on Xi Jinping's 'new era'

Sophie Earnshaw talks through what Xi Jinping's 'new era' means for investors. and why Chinese tech offers some of best growth stocks in the world.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: JM Finn on why the future is with financial planners

Profile: JM Finn on why the future is with financial planners

There is a lot of work on pension consolidation and Sipps have been a big driver there, says JM Finn chief executive

Wealth Manager on Twitter