Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

Rule or tool: Should you override a suitability risk profiler?

Rule or tool: Should you override a suitability risk profiler?

Coutts’s recent warning to clients that it must check the suitability of portfolios pre-retail distribution review (RDR) serves as a stark reminder that the sector continues to grapple with this profound issue.

Many firms have sought to improve their systems, processes and audit trails by introducing risk-profiling and portfolio-monitoring tools, such as Bita Risk and Dynamic Planner. However, investment managers face a dilemma if the risk profiler suggests the client has a different risk profile to the one documented, or the underlying asset allocation needs to be adjusted.

In this situation, should you back your judgment and knowledge of the client by overriding the tool or adjust things accordingly?

Neil Shillito of SG Wealth Management uses Oxford Risk’s Research and Analysis system as a guide, but challenges its suggestions. ‘We use it as a good quantitative guide but we do not slavishly follow it. A good example is that many clients automatically come out on the cautious side. The way the questions are framed leads them to think, “Yes, this is the answer for me”,’ he said. He cited questions such as ‘How would you feel if your portfolio fell 30%?’, which inspired caution. For this reason, he said it was important to talk the client through their answers and apply a qualitative overlay.

In overdrive

For large firms with big legacy books, it is much harder to override the findings of a tool, however. One industry insider from a firm that is repapering a large legacy book told Wealth Manager that the time, resources and client communication associated with sidestepping the tool represented a big challenge for individual managers. It has put the brakes on new business, which he expects will ultimately dampen revenue growth.

Shillito believes this is down to having too many clients per manager. ‘These companies don’t have the time and resources to explain the nature of the questionnaire and what they are trying to give in terms of guidance.’

He takes the view that the Financial Conduct Authority does not necessarily want to encourage a reliance on these tools but rather engagement with the client when it comes to ascertaining their risk profile and capacity for loss. He suspects the meeting notes subsequent to the questionnaire are as important as the questionnaire itself.

Knadel management consultant Robert Hupe agrees. ‘However complicated it might be to override the tool, it should not preclude you from doing so if it is right for the client,’ he said. ‘It means you as an organisation need the processes, procedures and audit trail to document why any override has taken place.’

Consultant Mike Browning said much came down to the tool itself and whether it fitted a firm’s broader suitability process. Blindly applying a tool may not work if it hadn’t been designed or applied with knowledge from the front office, he suggested.

He added that the industry relied too heavily on such tools without appropriate oversight and monitoring.

Quilter Cheviot, meanwhile, is one firm that has opted not to introduce any tools, preferring to rely on face-to-face interactions with the client. ‘We considered using a risk-profiling system but rejected it as it does not give you any further protection in front of the regulator,’ director Jane Seymour said.

‘We don’t see it as a panacea or that we are off the hook on the suitability question. Responsibility lies with us.’

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
CIO Tapes 2: two warnings and a lot of optimism

CIO Tapes 2: two warnings and a lot of optimism

Our group of leading asset management CIOs see a lot of opportunities – and overseas investors are buying UK too

Play Wealth Manager Retreat 2017: size isn't everything

Wealth Manager Retreat 2017: size isn't everything

We asked our delegates at the Wealth Manager Retreat what they think about the recent wave of consolidation in the industry.

1 Comment Play CIO Tapes - part 3: 'passive funds are anti-capitalist'

CIO Tapes - part 3: 'passive funds are anti-capitalist'

Citywire recently gathered three of the UK's leading fund investment heads to discuss their hopes, fears and the issues that their jobs throw at them daily.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: Thomas Miller explains its post-restructure plans

Profile: Thomas Miller explains its post-restructure plans

Thomas Miller Investment’s (TMI) head of wealth Matt Phillips has strong opinions about many things

Wealth Manager on Twitter
Managing risk, unearthing returns
  • A-rated Beagles sells down Brewin Dolphin
  • Electoral Commission reopens Vote Leave probe
  • City grandee says HBOS crisis 'worst moment' of his career
  • Ex-OMGI duo enters model portfolio market with new boutique
  • Abolish stamp duty: six wealth managers' Budget wish lists
  • James Carthew: is the Japanese glass half full, empty, or illusory?
  • The Expert View: William Hill, Mitie and Xaar
  • Overnight Markets: Tech shares buoy Wall Street
  • Tuesday Papers: May told to exploit Merkel crisis to reduce Brexit bill
  • Investors brush off German government worries
  • Buy-to-let crackdown? Charles Stanley's 5 Budget calls
  • Brewin Dolphin's south west assets hit £1bn
  • Wealth Manager Top 100 2017: seven hidden fund talents to watch
  • Read More