Wealth Manager - Essential news for investment professionals

Register to get unlimited access to all of Citywire’s Fund Manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

S&P loses landmark Australian court case on complex product ratings

S&P loses landmark Australian court case on complex product ratings

Ratings agencies across the globe could come under legal pressure after Standard & Poor’s lost a landmark Australian court case on the ‘misleading’ way it rated complex financial products just before the credit crunch.

S&P, along with ABN Amro, were sued by 12 New South Wales councils which claimed the misleading conduct cost them more than $16 million.  The councils had invested in constant proportion debt obligations (CPDOs), which lost around 90% of their value during the crisis.

The Federal Court ruled that S&P was ‘negligent’ and Justice Jayne Jagot said no competent ratings agency should have given the products such high ratings.

The implications of the 1459-page decision could be wide reaching and could draw in rival ratings agency Fitch and Moody’s. The UK, USA, New Zealand and Netherlands are expected to launch similar lawsuits against S&P.

According to reports S&P plans to appeal and dismissed ‘any suggestions our suggestions were inappropriate’.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: why Chris Wyllie joined Connor Broadley

Profile: why Chris Wyllie joined Connor Broadley

Professional footballers are not renowned for their financial acumen, but former Millwall player James Connor is an exception to the rule

Wealth Manager on Twitter