Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

The warning signs a fund is getting too big

The warning signs a fund is getting too big

Behemoth funds are an increasing by-product of concentration and crossover in buy lists, and are a significant problem for investment managers and fund analysts today.

It is a timely topic, with star manager Neil Woodford set to launch his CF Woodford Equity Income fund and many expecting him to attract billions in a number of months. While Woodford has shown that it is possible to manage over £30 billion and retain a high conviction style, others fare less well after their funds balloon in size.

Large flows can not only affect the liquidity profile of a fund but also pressure the manager to alter their mandate.

‘What you see is fund managers redefine their mandate to say it has more of a large cap focus,’ said Oliver Tucker, a fund of funds manager at Sarasin & Partners.

‘This is one of the reasons you need to be aware of style drift. It is not the same fund any more. Most large funds we see today that are big have to be managed in a different way and they can become different beasts.’

This does not necessarily mean it is time to sell the fund, but Tucker advises monitoring whether the manager is able to adapt their process and stay true to it, albeit with a different focus.

‘When people try and talk about whether there is someone that has the skill of running larger sums of money, I think in most cases it is not about saying how skilful they are, but are they able to adapt what they do to a larger scale so the profile is similar but not the same?’

He believes Nigel Thomas, manager of the AXA Framlington UK Select Opportunities fund, is someone who has been able to do this. Thomas’s fund is £4.8 billion, having attracted substantial flows over the past five years. While Tucker suggests there are subtle differences in the way Thomas manages money now, he believes the manager has retained his skill.

Alan Sippetts, head of manager research at Heartwood Investment Management, says a significant change in a fund manager’s approach rings alarm bells. He therefore advocates funds closing if they become too large or cramp the manager’s style.

‘I would rather see the same manager or team recognising there is a limitation to what they can do by limiting the size of the portfolio. Closures are unfortunately a by-product of success, but to be honest they are necessary,’ Sippetts said.

Five questions to ask 

There are no hard and fast rules when it comes to working out whether a manager’s style is changing as a result of the size of the fund. Each manager is different and how much money they can run before they are affected will depend on the markets they invest in.

However, Sarasin’s Oliver Tucker has revealed five questions to ask to ensure size is not compromising the fund manager’s style. If asset growth over the past 18 months is over 100%, he suggests there could be grounds to feel nervous.

1) How good has recent performance been?

2) How much crossover is there in the top holdings of the fund compared with funds that have a similar ranking?

3) How does the fund’s performance compare to its history?

4) And how does this fit with previous patterns in the fund manager’s history?

5) What have the asset flows over the last 18 months been?


Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
CIO Tapes 2: two warnings and a lot of optimism

CIO Tapes 2: two warnings and a lot of optimism

Our group of leading asset management CIOs see a lot of opportunities – and overseas investors are buying UK too

Play Wealth Manager Retreat 2017: size isn't everything

Wealth Manager Retreat 2017: size isn't everything

We asked our delegates at the Wealth Manager Retreat what they think about the recent wave of consolidation in the industry.

1 Comment Play CIO Tapes - part 3: 'passive funds are anti-capitalist'

CIO Tapes - part 3: 'passive funds are anti-capitalist'

Citywire recently gathered three of the UK's leading fund investment heads to discuss their hopes, fears and the issues that their jobs throw at them daily.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: Thomas Miller explains its post-restructure plans

Profile: Thomas Miller explains its post-restructure plans

Thomas Miller Investment’s (TMI) head of wealth Matt Phillips has strong opinions about many things

Wealth Manager on Twitter
Managing risk, unearthing returns
  • A-rated Beagles sells down Brewin Dolphin
  • Electoral Commission reopens Vote Leave probe
  • City grandee says HBOS crisis 'worst moment' of his career
  • Ex-OMGI duo enters model portfolio market with new boutique
  • Abolish stamp duty: six wealth managers' Budget wish lists
  • James Carthew: is the Japanese glass half full, empty, or illusory?
  • The Expert View: William Hill, Mitie and Xaar
  • Overnight Markets: Tech shares buoy Wall Street
  • Tuesday Papers: May told to exploit Merkel crisis to reduce Brexit bill
  • Investors brush off German government worries
  • Buy-to-let crackdown? Charles Stanley's 5 Budget calls
  • Brewin Dolphin's south west assets hit £1bn
  • Wealth Manager Top 100 2017: seven hidden fund talents to watch
  • Read More