Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register free for our breaking news email alerts with analysis and cutting edge commentary from our award winning team. Registration only takes a minute.

UK equities: 5 things outside Brexit you’d be wise to note

By Emma Mogford, portfolio manager UK equities, Newton

It’s impossible to avoid Brexit in the news – every bulletin seems to feature an update on the negotiations, or details of key personalities’ latest gaffes. This puts us in danger of ‘Brexit fatigue’ where we switch off from the news altogether. So what might have passed you by? 

1. The Bank of England has been steadily withdrawing stimulus…

The Bank of England’s shift has not been solely through the well-flagged interest rate rise in November. It has also started the process of reversing some smaller mechanisms that have been less talked about.

An example of this is the Term Funding Scheme (TFS), which was introduced in 2012 to encourage lending to smaller businesses and homeowners and is now set to expire. The TFS kept funding costs low, which meant banks could fund themselves more cheaply and in turn enabled lending. It particularly drove down the cost of funding for challenger banks, allowing them to get closer to the costs of large incumbents.

The most direct way of lowering funding costs is to lower interest rates across the board, which of course the BoE did in the aftermath of the financial crisis but once they reached a base rate of 0.5% they needed another mechanism to boost lending – so they implemented the TFS. Some banks have tried to pre-fund future business as far as possible, so we do not think the impact of its removal in February will be felt for another 18 months but then we would expect to see slower loan growth. The BoE is withdrawing stimulus because it feels the economy is recovering but as always, it is walking a tightrope. We would argue that while people focus on the headline base rate level decided by central banks, sometimes seemingly innocuous changes in policy have more of an impact on the real economy – this could be a perfect example.

2. The steady march of online retail sales penetration continues to wreack havoc in the retail sector…

We avoid the retail sector within our UK equity portfolios and the first quarter of 2018 has reminded us why. On top of the demise of brands such as Toys ‘r’ Us, Maplin and East, countless others have informed investors of plans to close stores (M&S, New Look) and/or to seek help through Company Voluntary Agreements designed to try and improve lease terms on stores.

During the recession that followed the global financial crisis there was a swathe of high street casualties; HMV and Woolworths were among the most publicised.

In our view, this time is different. Previously it was about stores not being able to keep up with debts and suffering the impact tighter household budgets had on shopping habits. Today we believe it is more of a structural shift – online sales are going up and up and we believe they are reaching critical levels. Traditional retailers that have not adapted quickly enough to this environment are going to continue to struggle and since it is hard to identify the winners and losers at the moment we are steering clear of the sector.

 

3. M&A of UK companies looks set to rise…

In March alone there were six bids for FTSE 350 companies. The bid targets were Hammerson, Laird, Shire, NEX Group, Fenner and SmurfitKappa. No-one has really put these bid targets together and discussed the surge. The cheaper pound has played a role in this increase in M&A activity but we also think there is a wider sense of stabilisation in the UK economy and this has encouraged overseas bidders. We think investors have been reassured that global growth is picking up and that in this context UK growth can continue despite a great deal of negotiation still to take place regarding Brexit.

This is in fact a return to trend: the UK market, and particularly the FTSE 250, has always been an attractive hunting ground for international companies looking to bolt on bite-size, unique firms in certain sectors. These companies tend to be specialists in what they do, so it is not about overseas businesses adding the UK as a geography to their portfolio but about adding expertise in a particular field.

 

4. While the UK market continued to get ‘cheaper’

Up to the 27 March 2018 the UK equity market was the worst-performing market year-to-date out of 67 tracked by Datastream. Since the dividend yield of an index goes up when its capital value goes down, the UK's dividend yield has picked up to an attractive 4%. It has only been higher in the past 20 years during 2008-09 and the dividend yield/bond yield gap has only been higher twice previously (during World War I and World War II). The recent de-rating of UK equities has driven the UK’s free cash flow yield towards 5%; only higher once since 1995 (during 2008-09). Data from fund flows tracker EPFR Globalhas also shown there have been net outflows from UK equities in five of the past six years, with particularly heavy outflows in the past two years.

These are good indications of value, in our view, and make the UK equity market an increasingly attractive investment proposition.

5. And relations with Russia worsened…

The nerve gas attack allegedly conducted by Russia on UK soil led to the expulsion of Russian diplomats from UK and more than 20 other countries. What is interesting is that the US has gone a step further and not only expelled 60 Russian diplomats but has also imposed sanctions on certain Russian oligarchs and companies, freezing property and financial assets and preventing them from transacting in US dollars. Ramifications could be felt by wealthy Russians in London too since Washington has warned British banks they could face severe penalties if they continue any dealings with those oligarchs named on the sanctions list. From a UK equity market perspective the sanctions have the potential to affect companies with significant stakes in Russian businesses. BP is one such company due to its stake in Russian oil company Rosneft. However, we hold BP and believe the impact will be minimal since its revenues from Rosneft are small compared with the size of the overall BP balance sheet.

The value of investments can fall. Investors may not get back the amount invested.

For Professional Clients only. This is a financial promotion and is not investment advice. Any views and opinions are those of the investment manager, unless otherwise noted. For further information visit the BNY Mellon Investment Management website. INV01268 Exp 18 July 2018.

 

 

This article was provided by BNY Mellon Investment Management and does not necessarily reflect the views of Citywire

Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: how career burnout led to a family office launch

Profile: how career burnout led to a family office launch

I was burnt-out from a career in finance and had no desire to come back, says the founder of Blu Family Office

Wealth Manager on Twitter