Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to all of Citywire’s Fund Manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

WMA: FCA business plan overlooks 'urgent' unfair FSCS issue

1 comment
WMA: FCA business plan overlooks 'urgent' unfair FSCS issue

The Wealth Management Association has condemned the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)'s business plan, claiming the regulator is overlooking FSCS problems in its annual review.

The trade body called on the FCA to 'reconsider the overall fairness' of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS)’s funding model to 'ensure firms undertaking promotional activities have to contribute their fair share to the FSCS'. 

This comes as the FCA reported investment firms could end up paying more than £30 million extra  into the FSCS over the next two years, solely to deal with claims arising from the failure of product promoter Catalyst Investment Group.

The £30 million 'interim payment' expected to be levied on investment firms follows the 'failure' of Catalyst, which was 'not required to pay anything' into the FSCS for its promotional activities, the WMA pointed out.

WMA chief executive Dr Tim May (pictured) said: 'The FCA’s business plan makes hardly any mention of its responsibility to manage the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

'The funding model for this essential scheme really does need urgent review. Promoters of financial products do not have to pay into the scheme: in instances such as the failure of Catalyst Investment Group, that leaves our members and other advisers paying an extra £30million into the scheme to make up for the shortfall.

'And to add insult to injustice, it now appears that IFAs in Malta can also claim off the UK compensation scheme in relation to the activities of Catalyst.'

While May insisted the WMA agrees with the principle that the investment community funds a compensation scheme to protect investors from industry failures, he said the principle had to 'be fair'.

'It is time that product providers and promoters take on their share of this funding burden. We now need the FCA to investigate this problem urgently.'

'The recent failure of Catalyst Investment Group is the most striking example of this weakness in the FSCS funding model.'

The financial watchdog published its business plan on 31 March, highlighting a number of issues it intended to target this year.

This included launching an investigation into whether there were conflicts of interest when wealth managers and private banks used in-house funds.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
Play Navigating geopolitical risk with ETFs

Navigating geopolitical risk with ETFs

ETFGI’s Deborah Fuhr on how investors can use exchange-traded funds to position their portfolio.

Play Sarasin’s Boucher: why I like salmon with chocolate

Sarasin’s Boucher: why I like salmon with chocolate

Henry Boucher, manager of the £129 million Sarasin Food & Agriculture Opportunities fund, explains why he is gobbling up salmon and chocolate stocks.

Play Alibaba hype, the UK slowdown and opportunities in European sovereign bonds

Alibaba hype, the UK slowdown and opportunities in European sovereign bonds

Libby Ashby and leading wealth managers analyse what the Alibaba IPO hype means for Chinese equities, slowing growth of the UK economy and whether there’s anything left to play for in the European sovereign bond market.

Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: Barclays' former advisory boss on his move into property

Profile: Barclays' former advisory boss on his move into property

On paper, Rick Denton might have been expected to finish his career in banking

Wealth Manager on Twitter