Citywire printed articles sponsored by:
View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/wealth-manager/article/a424889
Qualifications: Where will it all end?
Markets
by Danielle Levy on Aug 20, 2010 at 00:01
The retail distribution review (RDR) and CP 10/12 will introduce common denominators throughout the profession, but the key question for many wealth management businesses is what lies ahead?
Many argue RDR only marks the beginning of the raising of professional standards in the industry and anticipate that level 6 could soon officially become the benchmark.
Whether this will have a significant impact on the private client community remains to be seen. A survey carried out among the CISI’s members in autumn of last year found that 75% of respondents did not need to take higher level qualifications for the RDR, while Ian Cornwall, head of regulation at Apcims, estimates that 70% to 75% of its members are already qualified to level 6.
The CISI’s survey also found that 82% of respondents expect further increases in the level of exam standards for new entrants, with 88% in favour of raising qualification levels.
In a profession that is in the process of becoming even more professional, how can companies prepare for potential changes to standards in the future?
Charlie Hoffman, managing director at HSBC Private Bank, has introduced level 6 as the minimum for his team of relationship managers, with most taking the PCIAM or the Level 6 Diploma in Wealth Management. He estimates that 50% are level 6 qualified so far and hopes the whole team will be at this standard in 12 months’ time.
‘I don’t know if level 6 will become the minimum, but for HSBC Private Bank this is where we want to get our employees. We think our clients deserve this and it puts clear water between us and other boutiques and firms who aren’t committed to training their advisers,’ Hoffman said.
Looking ahead, the lay of the qualification landscape is slightly less clear, in Charles Stanley’s opinion. Learning and development manager Rebecca Young said the firm is holding fire on future training strategy until there is further clarification following the FSA’s consultation paper on Competence and Ethics (CP 10/12).
This outlines new qualification standards for discretionary managers (see our 'Guide to getting qualified'), including the IMC alongside the CFA. However, the list does not currently include the PCIAM, which many brokers who run advisory mandates previously opted for to cover them for the RDR. This represents a problem for those who run both retail advisory and discretionary mandates.
‘At this stage we are still digesting everything that is coming out. We will wait for a month or two to see if anything is going to be retracted or changed,’ Young said.
News sponsored by:
On the road
Click here to find out more from the Audience Development team.
Today's top headlines
More about this article:
More from us
- Redmayne's Spreng: My top tips for passing the PCIAM
- Video: Redmayne Bentley man believes RDR could hurt clients
- Charles Stanley's Davis: How to pass the Masters in Wealth Management
- Top 10 tips for passing the CFA
- Top 10 tips for passing the PCIAM
- What the RDR means for the future of qualifications
- Confused over qualifications? Get your questions answered here
- CISI: What the FSA's new TC regime means for discretionaries
- Discretionary managers face qualification drive under new FSA requirements
- Wealth managers slam FSA's new requirements for discretionaries
- 'Guide to getting qualified'



















2 comments so far. Why not have your say?
CoeurDeLion87
Aug 23, 2010 at 08:53
Rather like 'Big Bang' where banks and large investment houses steamrolled smaller broking firms the same thing is happening with RDR where again the larger more 'top down approach' firms are using 'higher professional standards' to soak up more business from smaller brokers who have the more experienced personnel but have been mainly grand-fathered into the industry. If regulators really do believe that 'consumers' will see better service and obtain improved advice then they are living in cloud cuckoo land. Mature stock markets have evolved through flair and entrepreneurial spirit and I see no sign of the 'new breed' allowing for this as the 'bottom up approach' gets more and more stifled by red-tape and committee decision-making approaches. Looking at those regulatorial boffins at FSA, CISI etc it's clear that RDR has been blended and cooked deliciously for certain firms that have managed to grow in the last 25 years at the mercy of the hundreds of firms that have been stranded by constrictive regulation and non-sensical interference. If british 'consumers' are going to ever receive truly independent advice after RDR is implemented then they are going to have to go offshore or elsewhere as the City is becoming an oasis for over-compliant chickens (or even cuckoos!). Private Client stockbroking and investment wealth management today has been butchered in the same way that the 'Reds' annihilated the thinking 'officer classes' after the revolution of 1917. The average age of stockbrokers has fallen from 45+ to under 35 and quite how the FSA can justify this through excessive examination imposed on those of us with 30+ years of experience is wholly un-British. The firing squads are lined up and just like the revolution the ordinary people will be the losers.
report thisAnonymous 1 needed this 'off the record'
Aug 23, 2010 at 13:38
If any private client thinks that this is being done for their benefit I suggest that they put all their money on deposit and forget about the 'market'
report thisleave a comment
Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.