Twitter icon Email alerts icon Latest News RSS icon Magazine icon Stay connected:

View the article online at

S&P loses landmark Australian court case on complex product ratings

by Dylan Lobo on Nov 06, 2012 at 08:05

S&P loses landmark Australian court case on complex product ratings

Ratings agencies across the globe could come under legal pressure after Standard & Poor’s lost a landmark Australian court case on the ‘misleading’ way it rated complex financial products just before the credit crunch.

S&P, along with ABN Amro, were sued by 12 New South Wales councils which claimed the misleading conduct cost them more than $16 million.  The councils had invested in constant proportion debt obligations (CPDOs), which lost around 90% of their value during the crisis.

The Federal Court ruled that S&P was ‘negligent’ and Justice Jayne Jagot said no competent ratings agency should have given the products such high ratings.

The implications of the 1459-page decision could be wide reaching and could draw in rival ratings agency Fitch and Moody’s. The UK, USA, New Zealand and Netherlands are expected to launch similar lawsuits against S&P.

According to reports S&P plans to appeal and dismissed ‘any suggestions our suggestions were inappropriate’.

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Sponsored Video: Bringing it all back home

As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.

Today's top headlines

Investing for income in a changing environment

With talk on interest rates on the horizon, our latest roundtable debate covers income investing against a changing backdrop

More about this:


On the road

Click here to find out more from the Audience Development team.


How is regulation feeding the outsourcing trend?

on Jul 24, 2014 at 10:59

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet