View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/wealth-manager/article/a631845
S&P loses landmark Australian court case on complex product ratings
by Dylan Lobo on Nov 06, 2012 at 08:05
Ratings agencies across the globe could come under legal pressure after Standard & Poor’s lost a landmark Australian court case on the ‘misleading’ way it rated complex financial products just before the credit crunch.
S&P, along with ABN Amro, were sued by 12 New South Wales councils which claimed the misleading conduct cost them more than $16 million. The councils had invested in constant proportion debt obligations (CPDOs), which lost around 90% of their value during the crisis.
The Federal Court ruled that S&P was ‘negligent’ and Justice Jayne Jagot said no competent ratings agency should have given the products such high ratings.
The implications of the 1459-page decision could be wide reaching and could draw in rival ratings agency Fitch and Moody’s. The UK, USA, New Zealand and Netherlands are expected to launch similar lawsuits against S&P.
According to reports S&P plans to appeal and dismissed ‘any suggestions our suggestions were inappropriate’.
News sponsored by:
As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.
Today's top headlines
With talk on interest rates on the horizon, our latest roundtable debate covers income investing against a changing backdrop
More about this:
On the road
by James Phillipps on Jul 25, 2014 at 14:49