View the article online at http://citywire.co.uk/wealth-manager/article/a653166
Wealth execs demand FSCS cost clarity as thresholds change
by Danielle Levy on Jan 29, 2013 at 09:47
Senior wealth management executives are demanding clarity over the long-term impact of the FSA’s exemption of income derived from funds from Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) tariff data and have slammed the affordability criteria.
Their comments follow the FSA’s decision to up the investment intermediation class threshold by £50 million to £150 million and reduce the investment fund management class threshold by £70 million to £200 million in April.
The regulator is also reconsidering allowing cross-subsidisation between FCA and PRA pools in the event of threshold breaches.
The Association of Private Client Investment Managers and Stockbrokers (Apcims) brands the FSA’s reliance on an affordability model put forward by Deloitte a major concern.
It says the model fails to take into account the impact of cumulative FSCS claims year-on-year when determining the ability of firms to pay the levy. Apcims says it also fails to take into account the ‘systemic risk’ of firms being unable to meet their FSCS liabilities.
The body has called for more detail on the long-term impact of the FSA’s decision to exempt income derived from funds from tariff data – a decision which has resulted in a £71 million shortfall, after fund management and investment intermediary firms resubmitted tariff data for 2010/11.
It said this will make it difficult to rely on historic data for the investment provision sub-classes. Apcims also took issue with the modelling of the investment intermediation class being based on revenue patterns pre-RDR.
Nonetheless, it welcomed the FSA’s decision to further consult on allowing some cross-subsidisation between FCA and PRA pools when an intermediation class breaches its threshold.
Jamie Matheson (pictured), executive chairman of Brewin Dolphin, said he had hoped the FSA had taken the opportunity to review its definition of annual eligible income, but welcomed the possibility of cross-subsidisation.
'We get some solace that there will be a further consultation about PRA regulated firms contributing to the pool, if the intermediary thresholds are breached in future. And although the definition of annual eligible income has not been refined as we hoped – an option to look again after the next levy remains on the table, which for us would be an important reform.'
News sponsored by:
Today's top headlines
More about this:
More from us
- Wealth firms face higher thresholds in new FSCS consultation
- Industry demands clarity on 'unacceptable' FSCS bills
- FSCS to pay back £71m but additional levy for 2010/11 expected