Twitter icon Email alerts icon Latest News RSS icon Magazine icon Stay connected:

View the article online at

Wealth managers expect equity fund charges to fall to 50bps

by James Phillipps on Nov 15, 2013 at 07:50

Wealth managers expect equity fund charges to fall to 50bps

Many of the country’s biggest wealth managers expect the average price of an actively managed equity fund to fall to as low as 50 basis points (bps), with fixed income products potentially costing just under half as much.

An exclusive Wealth Manager survey of the top 100 private client fund selectors found a large proportion expected fund charges to be squeezed down further.

The majority of fund groups set the bar at 75bps in the rush to launch clean share classes following the retail distribution review, this has already been pushed down by many distributors, with that trend expected to continue.

‘Actively managed equity funds may see total expense ratios come down to 50-65bps, while active fixed interest could fall to 20-40bps,’ said Ben Gutteridge, head of fund research at Brewin Dolphin, which holds £12.1 billion of client money in collectives.

Similarly David Coombs (pictured), head of multi-manager at Rathbones, which holds £8.6 billion in collectives, said he anticipates core equity funds charges will come down to 50-60bps with ‘core fixed income 30 to 35bps’.

Alan Scrimger, head of funds research at Ashcourt Rowan, also backed 50bps becoming the new standard, saying: ‘Long term, I sense most funds that charge more today will reduce their fees to 0.5%.’

However, wealth managers believe the top performing active managers will be able to retain their pricing power, with Sarasin’s Sam Jeffries saying: ‘We think in due course it may be that we see more differentiation in price as the better quality managers are able to justify a higher fee for better performance.’

Scrimger added: ‘People need to be prepared to pay a premium for smaller funds or boutiques.’

However, Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment senior reviewer Jonathan Beckett warns the squeeze on fees risks exacerbating the dominance of a smaller number of large fund groups.

He points out that whereas in 2008 the 10 largest fund groups controlled around a third of the industry’s assets under management, that figure has since risen to more than a half.  

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

1 comment so far. Why not have your say?

Investment Guru

Nov 15, 2013 at 09:57

I wonder where the industry expects typical Wealth Managers AMCs to fall to? I can't see 1% (plus VAT) let alone 1.25%/1.3% (plus VAT) to be sustainable in the long term.

report this

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Sponsored Video: Bringing it all back home

As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.

Today's top headlines

Investing for income in a changing environment

With talk on interest rates on the horizon, our latest roundtable debate covers income investing against a changing backdrop

More about this:


On the road

Click here to find out more from the Audience Development team.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet