Twitter icon Email alerts icon Latest News RSS icon Magazine icon Stay connected:

View the article online at

WMA calls on the FCA to reconsider FSCS levy burden

by Elsa Buchanan on Apr 15, 2014 at 14:50

WMA calls on the FCA to reconsider FSCS levy burden

The Wealth Management Association (WMA) has called on the FCA to reconsider the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), after it found that a third of compensation payments could be paying out for firms which never contributed.

This followed a FSCS announcement it would cut its levies on regulated firms for the coming year by £37 million - except for private client managers and financial advisers, who will see their bill for the year rise to over £110 million. 

The WMA said more than one-third of the £112 million contribution from investment firms (£47 million) will be spent in compensation to consumers affected by the failure of Catalyst Investment Group – including investors outside the UK.

In this month’s FSCS Outlook, the FSCS announced the 12-month compensation forecast for investment intermediaries had increased by £7 million, and the total payment included payments to Maltese investors.

Ian Cornwall, director of regulation at the WMA explained: 'The claims arising from Catalyst are due to the fact they promoted unregulated products: the promotional material they produced is reported to be unclear, unfair and misleading.

'So consequently consumers have a claim against Catalyst. In fact even consumers in Malta can claim off the UK compensation scheme in relation to the activities of Catalyst.'

The WMA claimed this situation 'contradicts the Financial Conduct Authority’s design principles for the FSCS, which include durability, resilience, fairness and affordability'.

Consequently, the WMA has called on the FCA to reconsider the overall fairness of the Scheme’s funding model to ensure firms undertaking promotional activities have to contribute their fair share.

'The FCA fails to take into account that firms undertaking promotional activity make no contribution to the FSCS pot,' added Cornwall.

'So we’re now in a position this year that a substantial chunk of the compensation claims against the investment intermediation class will be against Catalyst, which will not have paid one penny into the compensation scheme, and the FCA were aware of this defect in the funding model at the time they approved the rules.'

Sign in / register to view full article on one page

leave a comment

Please sign in here or register here to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

News sponsored by:

Sponsored Video: Bringing it all back home

As the UK coalition government strives to rebalance the national economy, so called 'reshoring' looks set to play an increasingly important role in economic recovery.

Today's top headlines

Sponsored Video: Barings on investing in Frontier Markets

From Nigeria to Pakistan and from Kenya to Kuwait, frontier markets are catching investors' attention as never before.

On the road

Click here to find out more from the Audience Development team.

Sorry, this link is not
quite ready yet